Has anybody tried this raise up kit? SSCustom says they dont have the fitment for the SCR950.They are playing safe I believe.
It sure looks like it would work and being based on the Bolt, I don't know why it wouldn't. Visit your local Yamaha dealer and take a few pics of a Bolt and compare. If you are a gambler, give it a try. If it doesn't fit, which is highly unlikely, send it back. You're only out the shipping. Keep us posted! JeversHas anybody tried this raise up kit? SSCustom says they dont have the fitment for the SCR950.They are playing safe I believe.
You are correct. I believe repositioning the original shocks would be less detrimental than longer/extended travel of replacement shocks. Original shocks would maintain the same range of motion, but you will have changed the geometry as you explained so well. Probably less variation in center distance than if you swap shocks and increased your range of motion. I'm pretty sure Charles will give us his first hand experience on the effects of longer/extended travel replacements. You'd probably have to ride like this guy before you would really have any problems.I got to wondering about changing the ride height based upon the shock length or changing the mounting points.
What happens to belt tension?
It appears that the static tension prescribed by Yamaha is set unladen with the swingarm in a position slightly lower than a straight line drawn through the
countershaft pulley, swingarm pivot and rear axle center. With a rider on board, the swing arm moves toward level, increasing belt tension somewhat due to the farthest point of
the rear pulley moving away from the other two points (photo). Past level, the belt loosens ever so slightly. This cycles countless times on a ride.
If the bike height is raised with longer shocks or different mounts, the swingarm would have an even lower starting point and thus require the belt be tightened more to achieve the recommended tension.
That would also mean the amount of tension would increase more than before as the swingarm travels through the level position while riding, yes?
Belt tension is much more critical than chain tension in order to prevent ratcheting of the belt teeth on the pulleys.
A chain run slack simply wears the sprocket teeth more rapidly and generally doesn't slip.
Thoughts?
I concur. I liken the stock suspension to a certain sore Male appendage the day after his wedding night. You just don't screw with it! 😖You are correct. I believe repositioning the original shocks would be less detrimental than longer/extended travel of replacement shocks. Original shocks would maintain the same range of motion, but you will have changed the geometry as you explained so well. Probably less variation in center distance than if you swap shocks and increased your range of motion. I'm pretty sure Charles will give us his first hand experience on the effects of longer/extended travel replacements. You'd probably have to ride like this guy before you would really have any problems.I got to wondering about changing the ride height based upon the shock length or changing the mounting points.
What happens to belt tension?
It appears that the static tension prescribed by Yamaha is set unladen with the swingarm in a position slightly lower than a straight line drawn through the
countershaft pulley, swingarm pivot and rear axle center. With a rider on board, the swing arm moves toward level, increasing belt tension somewhat due to the farthest point of
the rear pulley moving away from the other two points (photo). Past level, the belt loosens ever so slightly. This cycles countless times on a ride.
If the bike height is raised with longer shocks or different mounts, the swingarm would have an even lower starting point and thus require the belt be tightened more to achieve the recommended tension.
That would also mean the amount of tension would increase more than before as the swingarm travels through the level position while riding, yes?
Belt tension is much more critical than chain tension in order to prevent ratcheting of the belt teeth on the pulleys.
A chain run slack simply wears the sprocket teeth more rapidly and generally doesn't slip.
Thoughts?